PrivBeacon
Kom i gang
Accuracy

Tracker detection accuracy

These rates come from checked-in HTML fixtures, not an independent lab corpus. They are not a field false-positive/false-negative rate on the live web.

On this page
  1. 01Fixture summary
  2. 02Cases
  3. 03What this is not

1Fixture summary

Scored cases (excluding documented gaps): 6/6 passed (100%). Documented known gaps in this corpus: 1 false-positive class, 1 false-negative class.

Covered: known analytics/ad pixels, a clean page, CMP banner markup, iframe pixels, delayed inline loaders, first-party GTM proxy paths. Known gaps: consent-gated tags that keep a tracker src in the DOM (over-report); CNAME cloaking with no known analytics path (miss).

2Cases

  • Known Google Analytics + Meta pixel
    Pass · expected Google, Meta · found Google, Meta
  • No trackers
    Pass · expected none · found none
  • Consent banner markup
    Pass · expected none · found none
  • Iframe tracker
    Pass · expected Meta · found Meta
  • Delayed script still in HTML
    Pass · expected Google · found Google
  • Consent-gated tag that keeps tracker src in the DOM
    Fail · known false positive · expected none · found Google
  • CNAME cloaking without a known analytics path
    Pass · known false negative · expected none · found none
  • First-party GTM proxy path
    Pass · expected Google · found Google

3What this is not

We have not published an independent measurement of false-positive or false-negative rates on a labeled live-web corpus. Headless scans can still miss tags that load only after a click, after geo/consent APIs, or behind bot defenses. See the methodology page for browser behavior.

Scan methodology

PrivBeacon leverer automatiske privatlivsscanninger og dokumentskabeloner til informationsformål. Dette er ikke juridisk rådgivning. Rådfør dig med kvalificeret juridisk rådgiver, før du stoler på genererede politikker eller overholdelsesresultater for lovmæssige beslutninger.